← All Authorities
United States uncategorised

Percoco v United States

598 US 319 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A private citizen lacking a formal duty to the public cannot be convicted of honest-services fraud under 18 USC §1346 solely on the basis of influence over government decisions.

Key Principle

A private citizen who is not a public official cannot be convicted of honest-services fraud under 18 USC §1346 merely because they had influence over government decisions.

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123

Appellate court must itself assess whether jury verdict was unreasonable where unchallenged opportunity evidence raised reasonable doubt as to guilt.

Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (2020) 272 CLR 177

Search warrant executed at journalist's home held invalid for technical defects; High Court considered scope of implied freedom of political communication but declined to quash the warrant on that basis.

De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57

The High Court considered the Browne v Dunn rule and the appropriate jury directions when a party fails to cross-examine a witness on a matter it intends to contradict.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Percoco v United States and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Percoco v United States