← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case right to silenceadverse inferencepre trial silence

Petty and Maiden v The Queen

[1991] HCA 34; (1991) 173 CLR 95
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year1991
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

No adverse inference may be drawn, and no prosecution comment made, against an accused for exercising the right to silence before trial; reliance on the right to silence (including failing to disclose a defence later raised at trial) cannot be used to impugn credibility.

Area of Law

Criminal Law, Procedure & Evidence

Related Cases

McAuliffe v The Queen [1995] HCA 37; (1995) 183 CLR 108
M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487
Domican v The Queen [1992] HCA 13; (1992) 173 CLR 555

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Petty and Maiden v The Queen and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Petty and Maiden v The Queen