← All Authorities
United Kingdom abuse of dominancegrounds illegality

Pfizer and Flynn v CMA

[2022] UKSC 14
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2022
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has jurisdiction to assess whether a CMA penalty for competition law infringement is appropriate by reference to statutory criteria.

Key Principle

The Competition Appeal Tribunal may assess whether a penalty imposed by the CMA for competition law infringement is appropriate having regard to the statutory criteria.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pfizer and Flynn v CMA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pfizer and Flynn v CMA