← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case limitation periodsprofessional negligence

Pirelli General Cable Works Ltd v Oscar Faber and Partners

[1983] 2 AC 1
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1983
StatusBinding authority

Summary

In tort, a cause of action for latent damage accrues when physical damage occurs, not when the claimant discovers or could have discovered it.

Key Principle

latent damage; cause of action in tort accrues when damage occurs, not when discovered

Area of Law

Limitation

Related Cases

Wong Wai Man v Hospital Authority [2006] HKCFI 98

Addresses limitation period rules for latent damage in medical negligence claims in Hong Kong.

Bodycote HIP Ltd v Buckenham [2005] HKCA 273

Determines when time begins to run for negligence claims under the Hong Kong Limitation Ordinance (Cap 347), applying accrual principles to latent damage.

Law Society v Sephton and Co [2006] UKHL 22

A contingent liability does not constitute actionable damage for limitation purposes until the contingency materialises, so time does not run until then.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pirelli General Cable Works Ltd v Oscar Faber and Partners and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pirelli General Cable Works Lt...