Singapore abuse of dominance

PropertyGuru Pte Ltd v 99.co Pte Ltd

[2020] SGHC 64

JurisdictionSingapore

CourtSingapore High Court

Year2020

StatusBinding authority

Summary

Refusal by dominant property listing platform to deal with competitor may constitute abuse of dominant position under Competition Act s.47.

Key Principle

Competition Act s.47; abuse of dominant position; property listing platform; refusal to deal; exclusionary conduct

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

ACCC v Pacific National Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 77

Full Federal Court considered the test for substantially lessening competition under s.50 CCA in the context of a rail freight acquisition.

ACCC v Yazaki Corporation (2018) 262 CLR 1

HCA upheld record cartel penalties for wire harness market conduct, affirming that penalties must deter contravener and others, considering nature, extent, and duration of cartel.

ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 78

Full Federal Court considered whether Pfizer's patent evergreening strategy in the pharmaceutical market constituted misuse of market power under s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of PropertyGuru Pte Ltd v 99.co Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain PropertyGuru Pte Ltd v 99.co P...