← All Authorities
United Kingdom grounds illegalityremedies and discretion

R (on the application of Friends of the Earth) v Secretary of State for BEIS

[2023] EWHC 1964 (Admin)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales High Court (Administrative Court)
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Government's net zero strategy was unlawful under the Climate Change Act 2008 as it failed to include quantified policies sufficient to meet statutory carbon budgets.

Key Principle

net zero strategy judicial review; Climate Change Act 2008; government must have quantified policies sufficient to meet carbon budgets

Area of Law

environmental

Related Cases

Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2022] FCAFC 35

Full Federal Court overturned trial judge and held no novel duty of care is owed by the Environment Minister to Australian children when approving fossil fuel projects under climate change concerns.

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92

NSW Land and Environment Court held the EPA had a statutory duty under the POEO Act to develop environmental protection policies addressing climate change, enforceable by judicial review.

Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning (Rocky Hill Mine) [2019] NSWLEC 7

First Australian court decision refusing mine approval on climate change grounds, holding that a project's greenhouse gas contributions are a material consideration in planning decisions.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of R (on the application of Friends of the Earth) v Secretary of State for BEIS and how it applies to your situation.

Explain R (on the application of Frien...