← All Authorities
United Kingdom convention rightsproportionalityestates and interests

R (on the application of Mott) v Environment Agency

[2018] UKSC 10
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Salmon fishing licence restrictions constituted a disproportionate interference with property rights under ECHR A1P1, entitling the claimant to compensation.

Key Principle

salmon fishing restrictions; proportionality of environmental regulation affecting property rights; ECHR A1P1 and common law

Area of Law

environmental

Related Cases

Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2022] FCAFC 35

Full Federal Court overturned trial judge and held no novel duty of care is owed by the Environment Minister to Australian children when approving fossil fuel projects under climate change concerns.

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92

NSW Land and Environment Court held the EPA had a statutory duty under the POEO Act to develop environmental protection policies addressing climate change, enforceable by judicial review.

Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning (Rocky Hill Mine) [2019] NSWLEC 7

First Australian court decision refusing mine approval on climate change grounds, holding that a project's greenhouse gas contributions are a material consideration in planning decisions.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of R (on the application of Mott) v Environment Agency and how it applies to your situation.

Explain R (on the application of Mott)...