← All Authorities
United Kingdom uncategorized

R v Anderson; R v Morris

[1966] 2 QB 110; [1966] 2 WLR 1195; [1966] 2 All ER 644 (CA)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
Year1966
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Where parties embark on a joint enterprise, each is liable for acts done in pursuance of it, including unusual consequences; but a party is not liable where a co-adventurer departs completely from the common design and does an act outside its scope.

Area of Law

c

Related Cases

Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2008] 2 CLC 520
Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP (The Harriette N) [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2009] 1 All ER (Comm) 1035
R v Rahman [2008] UKHL 45; [2009] 1 AC 129; [2008] 3 WLR 264; [2008] 4 All ER 351

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of R v Anderson; R v Morris and how it applies to your situation.

Explain R v Anderson; R v Morris