← All Authorities
United Kingdom

R v Brown

[1994] 1 AC 212
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Year1994
Statusunclear

Key Principle

Consent no defence to sado-masochistic assault causing ABH; public policy limits on consent to bodily harm; autonomy vs paternalism

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123

Appellate court must itself assess whether jury verdict was unreasonable where unchallenged opportunity evidence raised reasonable doubt as to guilt.

Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (2020) 272 CLR 177

Search warrant executed at journalist's home held invalid for technical defects; High Court considered scope of implied freedom of political communication but declined to quash the warrant on that basis.

De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57

The High Court considered the Browne v Dunn rule and the appropriate jury directions when a party fails to cross-examine a witness on a matter it intends to contradict.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of R v Brown and how it applies to your situation.

Explain R v Brown