← All Authorities
Hong Kong amenability and standingassault battery false imprisonmentstrike out and summary judgment

Rashid Safar Ghori v Secretary for Justice

[2025] HKDC 1313
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHong Kong District Court
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Civil damages claims for unlawful detention are not automatically barred by prior unsuccessful habeas corpus proceedings.

Key Principle

The court considered whether civil damages claims for unlawful detention are barred after earlier habeas corpus attempts.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Rashid Safar Ghori v Secretary for Justice and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Rashid Safar Ghori v Secretary...