← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case penalty clauses and liquidated damages

RBC Properties Pte Ltd v Defu Furniture Pte Ltd

[2015] 1 SLR 997
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The penalty rule applies only to clauses triggered by breach; clauses requiring payment on a non-breach event fall outside its scope.

Key Principle

The SGCA held that the penalty rule applies only to clauses that require payment on breach; a clause requiring payment on an event other than breach falls outside the rule.

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560

On termination of a building contract, a builder may recover reasonable value of work done in restitution, subject to the contract price as a ceiling where work was performed under a valid contract.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Bank late payment fees are not penalties where they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss or protect a legitimate interest of the stipulating party.

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

High Court of Australia examined the principles governing rectification of written contracts for common intention and unilateral mistake in equity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of RBC Properties Pte Ltd v Defu Furniture Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain RBC Properties Pte Ltd v Defu ...