← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case shareholder rights

Re Duomatic Ltd

[1969] 2 Ch 365
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales High Court (Chancery Division)
Year1969
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Where all shareholders entitled to vote assent informally to a matter, their assent is as binding as a formal resolution passed at a general meeting.

Key Principle

The Duomatic principle: where all shareholders with the right to attend and vote at a general meeting assent to a matter informally, their assent is as binding as a formal resolution.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Re Duomatic Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Re Duomatic Ltd