← All Authorities
United Kingdom administrationbanking and finance

Re MF Global UK Ltd (In Special Administration)

[2013] EWHC 92 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Chancery Division)
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court considered the special administration regime for investment banks and rules governing client money pooling and distribution under CASS rules.

Key Principle

special administration regime for investment banks; client money distribution; pooling

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Re MF Global UK Ltd (In Special Administration) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Re MF Global UK Ltd (In Specia...