← All Authorities
Hong Kong unfair prejudice s994shareholder agreements

Re Peconic Industrial Development Ltd

[2001] HKCFI 318
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Exclusion from management of a quasi-partnership company constitutes unfairly prejudicial conduct warranting relief under the unfair prejudice jurisdiction.

Key Principle

unfair prejudice; exclusion from management of a quasi-partnership company amounts to unfairly prejudicial conduct

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Re Peconic Industrial Development Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Re Peconic Industrial Developm...