← All Authorities
Hong Kong uncategorized

Re Southwest Pacific Bauxite (HK) Ltd (Lasmos)

Re Southwest Pacific Bauxite (HK) Ltd [2018] 2 HKLRD 449; [2018] HKCFI 426 (also reported as Lasmos Ltd v Southwest Pacific Bauxite (HK) Ltd)
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtCourt of First Instance (Hong Kong)
Year2018
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A creditor's winding-up petition based on a debt subject to an arbitration agreement should generally be dismissed or stayed where the company disputes the debt, the dispute falls within the arbitration clause, and the company takes the contractually required steps to commence arbitration (the 'Lasmos approach').

Area of Law

i

Related Cases

Sit Kwong Lam v Petrolimex Singapore Pte Ltd Sit Kwong Lam v Petrolimex Singapore Pte Ltd [2019] 5 HKLRD 646; [2019] HKCA 1220
Re Joint Liquidators of Supreme Tycoon Ltd Re Joint Liquidators of Supreme Tycoon Ltd (in liquidation in the British Virgin Islands) [2018] 1 HKLRD 1120; [2018] HKCFI 277
Fateh Muhammad v Commissioner of Registration Fateh Muhammad v Commissioner of Registration (2001) 4 HKCFAR 278; [2001] 2 HKLRD 659; FACV No 2 of 2001 (HKCFA, 20 July 2001)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Re Southwest Pacific Bauxite (HK) Ltd (Lasmos) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Re Southwest Pacific Bauxite (...