← All Authorities
Hong Kong rhc order 32 applicationsarticle 35 right to legal advice

Re Timothy Wynn Owen KC

[2025] HKCFI 4569
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Provides latest guidance on the criteria and procedure for ad hoc admission of overseas counsel to appear in Hong Kong courts.

Key Principle

Provides latest guidance on ad hoc admission of overseas counsel.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Re Timothy Wynn Owen KC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Re Timothy Wynn Owen KC