← All Authorities
United Kingdom uncategorized

Regina v Ward

R v Ward (Judith) [1993] 1 WLR 619; (1993) 96 Cr App R 1; [1993] 2 All ER 577
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Year1993
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The prosecution is under a continuing common-law duty to disclose to the defence all relevant material, including unused scientific/forensic material, whether it strengthens or weakens the Crown's case.

Area of Law

c

Related Cases

Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2008] 2 CLC 520
Statoil ASA v Louis Dreyfus Energy Services LP (The Harriette N) [2008] EWHC 2257 (Comm); [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; [2009] 1 All ER (Comm) 1035
R v Rahman [2008] UKHL 45; [2009] 1 AC 129; [2008] 3 WLR 264; [2008] 4 All ER 351

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Regina v Ward and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Regina v Ward