← All Authorities
Australia parliamentary sovereignty

Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd

(2014) 253 CLR 543
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The Fair Work Act 2009 applies to seafarers on Australian-flagged vessels even when working outside Australian waters, the constitutional nexus being the vessel's flag.

Key Principle

The HCA held that the Fair Work Act 2009 applies to seafarers on Australian-flagged vessels, even if the work is performed outside Australian waters; the constitutional connection is the flag of the vessel.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Romero v Farstad Shipping (Ind...