← All Authorities
Singapore pure economic lossduty of caredefects

RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v Ocean Front Pte Ltd

[1996] 1 SLR(R) 113
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year1996
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A builder owes a duty of care in tort to subsequent purchasers of a building for pure economic loss arising from latent defects, where there is sufficient proximity and the imposition of a duty is just and reasonable. Singapore departed from the English Murphy v Brentwood DC no-duty position, adopting a two-stage proximity-plus-policy approach that foreshadowed the later Spandeck framework.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Noor Azlin bte Abdul Rahman v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd [2021] 2 SLR 440
I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting [2020] 1 SLR 1130
MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE [2019] SGCA 80

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v Ocean Front Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain RSP Architects Planners & Engi...