← All Authorities
Singapore

RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v Ocean Front Pte Ltd

[1996] 1 SLR(R) 113
JurisdictionSingapore
Year1996
Statusunclear

Key Principle

A builder owes a duty of care in tort to subsequent purchasers of a building for pure economic loss arising from latent defects, where there is sufficient proximity and the imposition of a duty is just and reasonable. Singapore departed from the English Murphy v Brentwood DC no-duty position, adopting a two-stage proximity-plus-policy approach that foreshadowed the later Spandeck framework.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 1349
Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99
Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 273 CLR 115

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v Ocean Front Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain RSP Architects Planners & Engi...