← All Authorities
Singapore restructuring plans part 26Aadministration

Salford Engineering Pte Ltd v Novo Tellus Alpha Acquisition Finance Ltd

[2023] SGCA 2
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Super-priority rescue financing under s.67 IRDA requires court satisfaction that adequate protection is provided to existing secured creditors.

Key Principle

The SGCA considered the super-priority regime for rescue financing under s.67 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 and held that the court must be satisfied that adequate protection is provided to existing secured creditors.

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Salford Engineering Pte Ltd v Novo Tellus Alpha Acquisition Finance Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Salford Engineering Pte Ltd v ...