A redacted co-defendant confession that replaces the defendant's name with a neutral pronoun does not violate the Confrontation Clause under Bruton, provided it does not directly implicate the defendant on its face.
criminal
Appellate court must itself assess whether jury verdict was unreasonable where unchallenged opportunity evidence raised reasonable doubt as to guilt.
Search warrant executed at journalist's home held invalid for technical defects; High Court considered scope of implied freedom of political communication but declined to quash the warrant on that basis.
The High Court considered the Browne v Dunn rule and the appropriate jury directions when a party fails to cross-examine a witness on a matter it intends to contradict.
Get a detailed analysis of Samia v United States and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Samia v United States