← All Authorities
Hong Kong Leading Case grounds illegalitypublic order ordinance

Secretary for Justice v Chan Chi Wan Stephen

(2017) 20 HKCFAR 98
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

CFA refined the elements of the common law offence of misconduct in public office, clarifying the wilfulness and seriousness requirements.

Key Principle

refinement of the misconduct in public office test

Area of Law

Public Law and Judicial Review

Related Cases

Democratic Republic of the Congo v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (2011) 14 HKCFAR 95

Following NPCSC interpretation of the Basic Law, Hong Kong courts must apply the doctrine of absolute state immunity, consistent with national policy, not the restrictive immunity previously applied.

Shum Kwok Sher v HKSAR (2002) 5 HKCFAR 381

Established the elements of the offence of misconduct in public office in Hong Kong, being the leading authority on official misconduct.

Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Ltd v Samantha Jane Bradley [2026] HKCFA 2

Article 35 Basic Law is self-executing and supports injunctive relief to protect the fundamental right of access to legal advice and the courts in Hong Kong.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Secretary for Justice v Chan Chi Wan Stephen and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Secretary for Justice v Chan C...