← All Authorities
Hong Kong Leading Case claim formsservice and gateways

Securities and Futures Commission v David Subotic and ors

[2023] HKCFA 32
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

CFA issued landmark ruling on requirements for service out of jurisdiction without leave under HK procedural rules.

Key Principle

Court of Final Appeal issued landmark decision on the requirements for service out of jurisdiction without leave.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Securities and Futures Commission v David Subotic and ors and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Securities and Futures Commiss...