← All Authorities
Singapore

Sembcorp Marine Ltd v PPL Holdings Pte Ltd

[2013] 4 SLR 193
JurisdictionSingapore
Year2013
Statusunclear

Key Principle

TWO distinct holdings, often conflated. (a) Implication of terms: three-step framework — gap, necessity, specific term. (b) The FOUR PLEADING DUTIES for the factual matrix, and the Evidence Act overlay. Citing Sembcorp only for implication misses the half that decides construction cases.

Area of Law

Contract and Interpretation

Related Cases

PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 129
Y.E.S. F&B Group Pte Ltd v Soup Restaurant Singapore Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 1187
MFM Restaurants Pte Ltd v Fish & Co Restaurants Pte Ltd [2011] 1 SLR 150

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Sembcorp Marine Ltd v PPL Holdings Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Sembcorp Marine Ltd v PPL Hold...