← All Authorities
Singapore unfair prejudice s994minority protection

Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd

[2022] 2 SLR 1
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2022
StatusBinding authority

Summary

In a minority oppression buy-out, share valuation should reflect post-valuation date events and no discount for lack of control should apply to the oppressed minority's shares.

Key Principle

minority oppression; buy-out; share valuation; DyStar joint venture; post-valuation date events; discount for lack of control

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Senda International Capital Lt...