← All Authorities
Hong Kong

SFC v Tiger Asia Management LLC

(2013) 16 HKCFAR 324
JurisdictionHong Kong
Year2013
Statusunclear

Key Principle

SFC enforcement powers; court may grant relief under s.213 SFO on application by SFC without prior criminal conviction

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of SFC v Tiger Asia Management LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain SFC v Tiger Asia Management LL...