← All Authorities
United States
habeas corpusineffective assistanceAEDPA
Shinn v Ramirez
Shinn v. Ramirez (Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez), 596 U.S. 366 (2022)
Key Principle
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2), a federal habeas court may not hold an evidentiary hearing or otherwise consider evidence beyond the state-court record to develop the merits of an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim where the prisoner failed to develop the factual basis in state court because of the ineffectiveness of state post-conviction counsel.
Area of Law
criminal
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Shinn v Ramirez and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Shinn v Ramirez