← All Authorities
Singapore duty to promote success s172duty of care skill diligence s174

Sim City Technology Ltd v Ng Kek Wee

[2018] SGCA 47
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Nominee directors owe duties of honesty and reasonable diligence to the company under s.157 Companies Act, not to their appointor.

Key Principle

Directors' duties under s.157 Companies Act: duty to act honestly and use reasonable diligence. Nominee directors owe duties to the company, not the appointor.

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Sim City Technology Ltd v Ng Kek Wee and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Sim City Technology Ltd v Ng K...