← All Authorities
United States Leading Case aggravated and exemplary damagesrule of law

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell

538 U.S. 408 (2003)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Punitive damages exceeding a single-digit ratio to compensatory damages are likely constitutionally excessive under the Due Process Clause, and out-of-state conduct cannot ordinarily ground such awards.

Key Principle

Punitive damages exceeding a single-digit ratio to compensatory damages are likely constitutionally excessive; out-of-state conduct generally cannot form the basis for punitive damages.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell and how it applies to your situation.

Explain State Farm Mutual Automobile I...