← All Authorities
Australia duty of carepsychiatric injurybreach standard of care

State of NSW v Paige

[2002] NSWCA 235
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtNSW Court of Appeal
Year2002
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Employer's liability for psychiatric injury to a police officer depends on foreseeability of harm and the employer's knowledge of the employee's vulnerability to post-traumatic stress.

Key Principle

police officer; post-traumatic stress; foreseeability; vulnerable employee; employer's knowledge

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of State of NSW v Paige and how it applies to your situation.

Explain State of NSW v Paige