← All Authorities
United Kingdom illegalityseparate legal personalityliquidation voluntary and compulsoryprofessional negligence

Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens

[2009] UKHL 39
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court (House of Lords)
Year2009
StatusOverruled

Summary

Sole directing mind's fraud attributed to company to bar auditor's negligence claim on illegality grounds; largely superseded by Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir [2015] UKSC 23.

Key Principle

illegality and attribution; sole directing mind's fraud attributed to company (controversial; largely superseded by Bilta)

Area of Law

Insolvency

Related Cases

Hardie Finance Corp Pty Ltd v Ahern (No 3) [2010] WASC 403

Applies the genuine dispute threshold under s.459H Corporations Act 2001 to determine whether a statutory demand should be set aside.

Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452

A supporting affidavit to a statutory demand must disclose facts sufficient to establish a genuine dispute, on its face, at the time of the demand.

BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25

Directors' duty to consider creditors' interests under s172(3) CA 2006 arises when a company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, not merely facing a risk of insolvency.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore St...