← All Authorities
Hong Kong strike out and summary judgmentpre action protocols

Sun Legend Investments Ltd v Ho Yuk Wah David

(2010) 13 HKCFAR 814
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2010
StatusBinding authority

Summary

CFA confirmed jurisdiction to strike out claims as abuse of process under the Henderson v Henderson rule, precluding relitigation of matters that could have been raised in earlier proceedings.

Key Principle

striking out; jurisdiction to strike out as abuse of process; Henderson v Henderson rule applied

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Sun Legend Investments Ltd v Ho Yuk Wah David and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Sun Legend Investments Ltd v H...