← All Authorities
Hong Kong arbitration agreements

Sun Tian Gang v Hong Kong & China Gas (Jilin) Limited

[2024] HKCFI 1597
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHong Kong Court of First Instance
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court provided guidance on determining whether an arbitration qualifies as domestic arbitration under s.100(a) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609).

Key Principle

Court provided guidance on determining whether arbitration is domestic arbitration under s.100(a) of Cap 609.

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514

A dispute must be referred to arbitration if it falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, applying a generous interpretation in favour of arbitrability.

TCL Air Conditioner v Judges of the Federal Court (Arbitral Awards) [2013] HCA 5

Enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards does not involve arbitrators exercising judicial power; enforcement itself is a judicial function constitutionally vested in Chapter III courts.

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415

Court considered how the Guy Lam discretion operates where the existence of an arbitration agreement is itself in dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Sun Tian Gang v Hong Kong & China Gas (Jilin) Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Sun Tian Gang v Hong Kong & Ch...