← All Authorities
Hong Kong permission stage and time limits

Titan Petrochemicals Group Limited v The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited

[2023] HKCFI 2935
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court clarified the time frame requirements for making applications for leave to apply for judicial review in HK.

Key Principle

Court clarified the time frame requirements for making applications for leave to apply for judicial review.

Area of Law

public-law

Related Cases

CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 255 CLR 514

The Maritime Powers Act 2013 authorised detention and return of asylum seekers at sea; executive power extends to removal of non-citizens from Australian waters.

Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135

A reasonable apprehension of bias arises where a council officer who lodged a complaint against a dog owner also participated in the decision to order destruction of the dog.

Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 251 CLR 1

Ministerial power to detain and remove non-citizens under the Migration Act must be exercised in accordance with the Act; adverse ASIO security assessments do not compel indefinite detention.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Titan Petrochemicals Group Limited v The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Titan Petrochemicals Group Lim...