← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case arbitration agreementsanti suit injunctions

Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v Silica Investors Ltd (Stay for Arbitration)

[2016] SGCA 25
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2016
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Where some but not all claims are subject to an arbitration agreement, the court has a discretion to grant a case management stay of non-arbitrable claims pending arbitration of the arbitrable ones.

Key Principle

Where some but not all claims are subject to an arbitration agreement, the court has a discretion to grant a case management stay of the non-arbitrable claims pending arbitration of the arbitrable ones.

Area of Law

arbitration

Related Cases

Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514

A dispute must be referred to arbitration if it falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, applying a generous interpretation in favour of arbitrability.

TCL Air Conditioner v Judges of the Federal Court (Arbitral Awards) [2013] HCA 5

Enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards does not involve arbitrators exercising judicial power; enforcement itself is a judicial function constitutionally vested in Chapter III courts.

Re Shift Energy Asia Limited [2025] HKCFI 6415

Court considered how the Guy Lam discretion operates where the existence of an arbitration agreement is itself in dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v Silica Investors Ltd (Stay for Arbitration) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v Silic...