← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case construction interpretationillegality

Uber BV v Aslam

[2021] UKSC 5
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A written contract is not determinative of employment status where it departs from the true reality of the relationship, and Uber drivers are 'workers' entitled to statutory rights.

Key Principle

workers' rights; written contract not determinative where it departs from reality

Area of Law

Employment

Related Cases

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169

Australian law does not recognise an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in employment contracts, departing from the UK position in Malik v BCCI.

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410

The High Court considered the implication of terms into employment contracts, including whether a term of good faith or fair dealing could be implied at common law to constrain unfair dismissal.

Tadjudin v Bank of America NA (2016) 19 HKCFAR 690

An employer must not exercise contractual discretion irrationally or in bad faith; HK leading authority equivalent to Braganza on implied limitations on contractual discretion.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Uber BV v Aslam and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Uber BV v Aslam