← All Authorities
United States Leading Case separation of powers

United States v Booker

543 U.S. 220 (2005)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Federal Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, not mandatory, as mandatory application would violate the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial under Apprendi and Blakely.

Key Principle

Sixth Amendment; federal sentencing guidelines advisory not mandatory after Apprendi/Blakely

Area of Law

criminal

Related Cases

Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123

Appellate court must itself assess whether jury verdict was unreasonable where unchallenged opportunity evidence raised reasonable doubt as to guilt.

Smethurst v Commissioner of Police (2020) 272 CLR 177

Search warrant executed at journalist's home held invalid for technical defects; High Court considered scope of implied freedom of political communication but declined to quash the warrant on that basis.

De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57

The High Court considered the Browne v Dunn rule and the appropriate jury directions when a party fails to cross-examine a witness on a matter it intends to contradict.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of United States v Booker and how it applies to your situation.

Explain United States v Booker