← All Authorities
Hong Kong damagesenforcementremoteness

廈門新景地集團有限公司 v Eton Properties Limited

Xiamen Xinjingdi Group Co Ltd v Eton Properties Ltd [2025] HKCA 1119
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtCourt of Appeal of the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a defendant has breached an implied promise to honour an arbitral award (here requiring continued performance of a 2003 agreement), damages are assessed on a realistic counterfactual of what would have happened had the award been performed at the breach date, allowing recovery of lost profits net of costs and excluding losses attributable to the defendant's own self-inflicted obstacles to performance.

Area of Law

commercial

Related Cases

Cheung Kong Property (Business Development) Ltd v Gold Brilliant Investment Ltd & Pan Sutong Cheung Kong Property (Business Development) Ltd v Gold Brilliant Investment Ltd [2025] HKCFI 6181 (Court of First Instance, not Court of Appeal)
Property Dynasty Ltd v Han Kun Law Offices LLP [2025] HKCFI 5628 [2025] HKCFI 5628
Delco Participation BV v HWH Holdings Limited & others [2025] HKCFI 4739

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of 廈門新景地集團有限公司 v Eton Properties Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain 廈門新景地集團有限公司 v Eton Properties ...