← All Authorities
United States

Verizon Communications Inc v Law Offices of Curtis V Trinko LLP

540 U.S. 398 (2004)
JurisdictionUnited States
Year2004
Statusunclear

Key Principle

The Sherman Act does not impose a general duty on monopolists to share their facilities with competitors; the essential facilities doctrine is limited.

Area of Law

competition

Related Cases

ACCC v Pacific National Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 77
ACCC v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243
ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 78

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Verizon Communications Inc v Law Offices of Curtis V Trinko LLP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Verizon Communications Inc v L...