← All Authorities
Hong Kong rhc order 24 discoverypre action disclosureprofessional negligence

Victory City International Holdings Limited v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

[2024] HKCFI 1291
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court considered specific discovery applications prior to filing of Statement of Claim in the context of audit negligence proceedings in Hong Kong.

Key Principle

Court considered specific discovery applications before filing of Statement of Claim in audit negligence cases.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Victory City International Holdings Limited v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Victory City International Hol...