Misuse of private information is a standalone tort, and damages for distress alone are recoverable without proof of pecuniary loss.
data-protection
A financial services licensee breached its statutory duty to act efficiently and fairly by failing to implement adequate cybersecurity measures to protect client data.
Singapore's largest data breach involving 1.5 million patient records held to constitute breach of PDPA protection obligation due to systemic IT security failings.
Representative actions under CPR 19.6 cannot proceed for DPA 1998 damages where class members' claims depend on individual circumstances, failing the 'same interest' requirement.
Get a detailed analysis of Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Misuse of Private Information) and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Misus...