← All Authorities
Hong Kong

Wei v Barfield & Ors

[2017] HKCFI 295
JurisdictionHong Kong
Year2017
Statusunclear

Key Principle

directors duties under Cap 622 Part 10; duty to act in good faith in interests of the company

Area of Law

company

Related Cases

Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 465

A company secretary is an 'officer' under the Corporations Act and owes a duty of care and diligence under s 180 in performing their functions.

Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] WASCA 157

Directors of an insolvent company owe duties to creditors, and bank claims may be subordinated where unconscionable conduct is established in dealings with the insolvent company.

Barclay v Penberthy (2012) 246 CLR 258

The standard of care under s 180 of the Corporations Act is that of a reasonable person in the director's position, having regard to the corporation's circumstances and the director's office.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Wei v Barfield & Ors and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Wei v Barfield & Ors