← All Authorities
United States Leading Case corporate insolvencyjudgment

Wellness International Network Ltd v Sharif

575 U.S. 665 (2015)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Parties may consent to a bankruptcy court entering final judgment on Stern v Marshall claims, satisfying Article III constitutional requirements through waiver.

Key Principle

bankruptcy court; Article III; parties can consent to bankruptcy judge entering final judgment on Stern claims

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Wellness International Network Ltd v Sharif and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Wellness International Network...