← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case dishonest assistancetransactions at undervalueno conflict rule

Westpac Banking Corporation v Bell Group Ltd (in liq)

(2012) 44 WAR 1
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtSupreme Court of Western Australia Court of Appeal
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Summary

In Australia's largest commercial litigation, banks held liable under Barnes v Addy knowing assistance for participating in subordination agreements that breached directors' fiduciary duties to creditors.

Key Principle

largest Australian commercial litigation; subordination agreements; Barnes v Addy knowing assistance

Area of Law

insolvency

Related Cases

Stubbings v Jams 2 International Pty Ltd (2022) 399 ALR 409

In unfair preference claims, payments and supplies within a continuing business relationship are assessed as a whole under the running account principle, not individually.

Stubbings v Jams 2 Pty Ltd (2022) 276 CLR 233

HCA held that a creditor's statutory demand under s.459E Corporations Act cannot be set aside merely because the company disputes the debt; a genuine dispute on substantial grounds must be shown.

Vince v ASIC [2021] FCAFC 69

Director disqualification upheld where director failed to maintain adequate books and records, constituting misconduct in management of insolvent company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Westpac Banking Corporation v Bell Group Ltd (in liq) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Westpac Banking Corporation v ...