United States unconscionabilityconsumer protection

Williams v Walker-Thomas Furniture Co

350 F.2d 445 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Year1965

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A court may refuse to enforce a contract or clause found to be unconscionable at the time it was made, considering absence of meaningful choice and unreasonably favorable terms.

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

ProCD Inc v Zeidenberg 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)

Sullivan v O'Connor 363 Mass. 579 (1973)

Hoffman v Red Owl Stores Inc 26 Wis. 2d 683 (1965)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Williams v Walker-Thomas Furniture Co and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Williams v Walker-Thomas Furni...