← All Authorities
Hong Kong penalty clauses and liquidated damages

Wong Wai Yin v Mykal Holdings Ltd

[2002] HKCFA 53
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2002
StatusBinding authority

Summary

CFA applied the genuine pre-estimate of loss test to determine whether a contractual clause constituted an unenforceable penalty or valid liquidated damages.

Key Principle

penalties and forfeiture; CFA applied the genuine pre-estimate of loss test

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560

On termination of a building contract, a builder may recover reasonable value of work done in restitution, subject to the contract price as a ceiling where work was performed under a valid contract.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Bank late payment fees are not penalties where they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss or protect a legitimate interest of the stipulating party.

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

High Court of Australia examined the principles governing rectification of written contracts for common intention and unilateral mistake in equity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Wong Wai Yin v Mykal Holdings Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Wong Wai Yin v Mykal Holdings ...