← All Authorities
Hong Kong case management

X v Y [2019] HKCFI 2880

[2019] HKCFI 2880
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2019
Statusunclear

Summary

Dicta established regarding rule 45(5)(d) in procedural matters before the Hong Kong Court of First Instance.

Key Principle

The case established dicta regarding rule 45(5)(d) in procedural matters.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of X v Y [2019] HKCFI 2880 and how it applies to your situation.

Explain X v Y [2019] HKCFI 2880