← All Authorities
Hong Kong civil procedure

X v Y [2020] HKCFI 3178

[2020] HKCFI 3178
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court applied well-established procedural principles and upheld the decision under review on procedural grounds.

Key Principle

The Court applied well-established principles and upheld this subsequent decision regarding procedural rules.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of X v Y [2020] HKCFI 3178 and how it applies to your situation.

Explain X v Y [2020] HKCFI 3178