← All Authorities
United States Leading Case foreign judgments common lawreceivers

Yegiazaryan v Smagin

599 U.S. 533 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A California-based judgment creditor suffers a domestic injury under RICO when an offshore scheme targets and frustrates enforcement of rights centered in the United States.

Key Principle

RICO; domestic injury requirement; judgment creditor in California suffered domestic injury from offshore scheme

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Yegiazaryan v Smagin and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Yegiazaryan v Smagin