← All Authorities
United States constitutionalgrounds illegality

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v Texas

596 U.S. 685 (2022)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2022
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The Restoration Act prohibits the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo from conducting gaming activities that Texas law prohibits, incorporating state law as the federal standard for tribal gaming regulation.

Key Principle

Indian gaming; Restoration Act prohibits gaming activities prohibited by Texas law; federal Indian law preemption; tribal sovereignty

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v Texas and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v Texas